DINESH SINGH, KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
Aryan Lifestyles Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sameer Nayyar – Respondent
ORDER
The appeal is listed for final hearing. No one appears for the respondents despite service. We do not see any good reason to delay the hearing any further and deem it appropriate to decide the matter on its merits. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and have perused the record.
2. The case was filed as a revision petition under section 21(b) of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against interlocutory Orders dated 18.01.2018 and dated 29.01.2019 of the State Commission in complaint no. 2070 of 2017. In the hearing before a co-ordinate bench of this Commission on 20.05.2019 the matter was ordered to be treated as an appeal under section 19 of the Act 1986. On the statement made by the learned counsel for the appellant the challenge to the Order dated 18.01.2018 was dropped and the appeal was confined to the Order dated 29.01.2019 alone.
This Commission’s Order of 20.05.2019 is reproduced below for reference:
20.05.2019
Order
In the present Revision Petition, which has been filed by the Petitioner, Office Report has been put up that the Revision Petition is not maintainable and only an Appeal lies. The objection taken by the office appears to be genuine. The offic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.