SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH
Inland World Logistics Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mrs. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. K.K. Bhat, Advocate

ORDER

The present Consumer Complaint (CC) has been filed by the Complainant against the opposite party as detailed above, inter aila praying for directing the Opposite Party (OP) to:—

(i) grant Rs.17,41,94,520/- alongwith interest @18% p.a. towards the loss of goods due to the accident (Rs.7,75,00,000/- towards principal, and interest Rs.9,66,94,520/-, calculated @18% from 14.09.2010 to 15.07.2017);

(ii) grant pendentelite and future interest @ 18% per annum till realization;

(iii) grant an amount of Rs.50,00,000/- towards damages;

(iv) grant cost of litigation of Rs.10,00,000/-.

2. Notice was issued to the opposite party on 20.09.2017 giving them 30 days’ time to file their written statement.

3. It is averred/stated in the complaint that:—

(i) That the complainant is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in transportation of consignments across India for various customers. The complainant is a logistic company which is globally respected as one of the industry leaders in offering point to point services for transportation of goods and storage facilities and has over 350 locations, fleet of vehicles and a nation-wide network. The complainant,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top