Rupali Bahl VS Ireo Grace Realtech Private Limited

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, INDER JIT SINGH
Rupali Bahl – Appellant
Versus
Ireo Grace Realtech Private Limited – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Deepak Kr. Khushalani, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Kumar and Mr. Ram Avtaar, Complainant in person Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate Ms. Sumbul Ismail, Advocate Ms. Priya, Advocate Mr. Subhash Oberoi, Advocate Mr. Varun Bhandari, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Sameer Chaudhary, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Ahuja, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, Ms. Ruchi Kumar, Mr. Chaitanya Bansal, Advocates, Ms. Sadhvi Swaroup, Advocate Mr. Arvind Lamba, Advocate Mr. Sunil Mund, Advocate with Ms. Archana Yadav, Advocate for OP-3

ORDER

Heard Mr. Deepak Kr. Khushalani, Advocate, for the complainant and Mr. Sameer Chaudhary, Advocate, for the opposite parties.

2. Above bunch of the complaints have been filed against same opposite parties in respect of same project “The Corridors”. The complainants in these complaints sought for the relief of refund while the opposite party claimed for forfeiture of “earnest money” as such these complaints are decided together. For appreciating the controversy between the parties, the facts of CC/107/2019 are mentioned in the judgment. Necessary facts of the complaints are given in a table below:—

Complaint No.	Complainant Name	Unit No.	Date of Booking	Total Payment
CC/107/2019	Rupali Bahl	CD-B1-09-903	14.03.2013	Rs.5855264/-
CC/196/2019	Ankur Pasari	CD-A5-10-1002	01.05.2014	Rs.6605147/-
CC/554/2017	Vineet Kapila	CD-C5-03-303	18.05.2013	Rs.2458000/-
CC/1301/2017	Hemant Upadhyaya	CD-C10-03-304	22.03.2013	Rs.5590920/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, INDER JIT SINGHRupali Bahl – AppellantVersusIreo Grace Realtech Private Limited – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, INDER JIT SINGH
Rupali Bahl – Appellant
Versus
Ireo Grace Realtech Private Limited – Respondent