SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MANOJIT MANDAL, SAMIKSHA BHATTACHARYA, SHYAMAL KUMAR GHOSH
Aparna Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Corporation – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. S.S. Munda, Mr. Kusal Bhattacharjee, Advocates
For the Opp. Parties: None appears

ORDER

Manojit Mandal, President—This complaint is filed by the complainant under section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 read with other relevant provisions and sections of the said Consumer Protection Act, 2019 alleging gross deficiency and negligence of services on the part of the opposite parties.

2. The complainant has filed this case praying for the following reliefs:—

“(i) To admit the complaint;

(ii) To issue notice upon all the opposite parties named in the complaint;

(iii) To pass an order of interim injunction under section 38(8) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 restraining the opposite parties with the direction, not to sale, mortgage, assign, rent, lease or transfer in any way, the said residential Flats and the car parking spaces in reference mentioned in the Schedule ‘A’ hereunder written, till final disposal of this complaint;

(iv) To direct all the opposite parties forthwith execute and register the Deed of Conveyance in favour of the complainant as per the Verbal Agreement and Money Receipts, in respect of the Schedule ‘A’ property.

Alternatively

The Deed of Conveyance be executed and registered in terms of the Verbal Agreement and Money Rece

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top