SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MANOJIT MANDAL, SAMIKSHA BHATTACHARYA, SHYAMAL KUMAR GHOSH
Satya Brat Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
Vedic Conclave Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Abhishek Datta, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: None appears

JUDGMENT

Manojit Mandal, President—This consumer complaint case has been filed by the complainant under section 34 & 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 ( in short, ‘the Act’) alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice adopted by the opposite parties No.1, 2 & 4 valued at Rs.71,48,000/- ( Rupees seventy one lakh and forty eight thousand) only. The complainant has filed this consumer complaint case praying for the following reliefs:—

“(i) Handover the physical possession of the said flat making it habitable by completing all interior and exterior works of the flat by executing the registered Deed of Conveyance in favour of complainant.

(ii) Handover and/or supply the completion certificate of the said project to the complainant.

(iii) Refund a sum of Rs.29,22,782/- (Rupees Twenty Nine Lakhs Twenty Two Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty Two) only towards earnest money paid by the complainant to the opposite parties alongwith interest

(iv) Pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) as the cost of the legal expenses tentatively incurred by the complainant.

(v) Pay a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs only) for compensation.

(vi) Refund the earne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top