SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R. SUBBIAH, R. VENKATESAPERUMAL
K. Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
Regional Manager Bank of Baroda – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant: In person
For the Opp. Party No.1: M/s. P.R. Raman
For the Opp. Party No.2: M/s. S. Padma

ORDER

R. Subbiah, President—This complaint has been filed under Sec.17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as against the opposite parties for the following reliefs:—

1. To pay the Revenue loss on own investment @Rs.21,94,182.47/-

2. To pay Rs.17,32,432.42/- towards promoter wages

3. To pay the security wages @Rs.4,33,664.21/-

4. To pay Rs.51,97,297.26/- towards mental agony

5. To pay Rs.1,20,920.28/- towards Revenue loss on subsidy and

6. To pay Rs.1,50,000/-towards rehabilitation liaison expenses

Totally a sum of Rs.98,28,496.64/-

2. The case of the complainant could be culled out from the pleadings, in brief is as follows:

The Central Government of India had invited the first generation entrepreneurial aspirants to execute projects for the motivation of self employment generation as well as eradication of unemployment through the Prime Minister Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP). The complainant who was very much impressed upon the said scheme, took a voluntary retirement from the Government Service for execution of an Agro based MSME project as a priority sector of the Government in a backward rural area. The said scheme was implemented by the Khadi and Vill

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top