SUDIP AHLUWALIA, INDER JIT SINGH
Suresh Prasad Gupta – Appellant
Versus
M. D. Tata Motors – Respondent
ORDER
Sudip Ahluwalia, Member—This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/ Complainant against the Respondents / Opposite Parties challenging the impugned Order dated 10.08.2016 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Patna, Bihar, in Appeal bearing No. 220 of 2015. Vide such Order, the State Commission had allowed the Appeal while setting aside the Order dated 18.06.2015 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Rohtas (Sasaram), in Case No. 13/2013.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the Complainant had purchased a Tata Indigo Mazda QZ vehicle bearing registration no. BR-24H-8111 by taking a loan from Tata Motors on 18.01.2010 as it was needed on a regular basis for the treatment of his family members. It was the case of the Complainant that he had taken the car to Pirana Motors, Gaya, on 21.10.2010 as the accelerator used to come to a halt. However, no attention was paid and the vehicle was returned without any clarification. Again, on 26.12.2010, the Complainant took the vehicle to Kumar Distributors, Patna, and informed them about the defect. However no defect was traced and the Complainant was not given a clear response. Now, the Complainant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.