SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R. K. AGRAWAL, S. M. KANTIKAR
HCC-CPPL JV – Appellant
Versus
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Ms. Anubha Agrawal, Advocate, Mr. Tadimalla Bhaskar Gowtham, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Katta Laxmi Prasad, Advocate

ORDER

The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by M/s HCC-CPPL JV (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant Company) against Opposite Party, i.e., ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Opposite Party Insurance Company).

2. The brief facts of the case are that the Complainant Company is specialized in Canal Earthworks, Hydro Based Projects and Tunneling Projects. Government of Andhra Pradesh awarded a contract to the Complainant for executing the Vellgonda Tunnel Irrigation Project. The contract was awarded to the Complainant for Rs.7,35,21,00,000/- and Agreement with the State Government was entered into on 21.06.2007. The contract value included the cost, transportation, storage, assembling, erection, commissioning and operation of Tunnel Boring Machine till the end of the completion of the Project. In response to quotations invited from various Insurance Companies to cover the Project under Contractor’s All Risk (CAR) Insurance Policy, the Opposite Party Insurance

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top