SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH CHANDRA, J. RAJENDRA
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Kumar Bansal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Rajesh K. Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Alok Bhachawat, Advocate

ORDER

AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM, VSM (Retd.), Member—The present First Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against the Order dated 02.05.2018 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (hereinafter to be referred as “the State Commission”), in Consumer Complaint No.198 of 2006, wherein the Complaint filed by the Complainant (Respondent herein) was allowed by the learned State Commission.

2. For the sake of Convenience, the parties in the present matter being referred to as mentioned in the Complaint before the State Commission Shri Naresh Kumar Bansal, Proprietor of M/s. Shyam Jewelers is identified as ‘the Complainant’ and while M/s. Oriental Insurance Company Limited & Anr. are referred to as ‘the Opposite Parties’ or ‘the Insurer’.

3. There was a delay of 27 days in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in IA/14680/2018 the delay in filing the Appeal is condoned.

4. Brief relevant facts of the case as per the Complainant are that the Complainant was the proprietor of M/s Shyam Jewelers, located in Chandni Chowk, Delhi. He obtained a ‘Jeweler’s Block Insurance’ Policy No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top