SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
Golden Bricks Promoters Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rattan Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kusharga Bansal, Advocate

ORDER

This revision has been filed under section section 58(1)(b) of The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 in challenge to the Order dated 24.01.2023 of the State Commission in Appeal no. 597 of 2022 arising out of the Order dated 26.08.2022 of the District Commission in Complaint no. 08 of 2020.

2. Relevant facts of the case have been succinctly captured by the State Commission in para 3 of its impugned Order, which are being reproduced below for reference:

The brief facts evolve from the complaint are that the Ops No. 1 & 2 are builders and OP No. 3 was their agent. Complainant wanted to purchase a 2BHK flat, so he paid an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- on 08.04.2013 as first instalment and this is how in all a total amount of 10,41,312/- was paid to the Ops on different dates. Ops assured him that the flat in question complete in all respects will be hand over to him within a period of 3 ½ years when he paid first instalment. It was alleged that he visited the site of OPs in the months of November 2016 but found that construction work had not even been started at the site and position was again the same in the month of April,2018. Thereafter, he requested Ops to refund his deposited amount

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top