SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH
M. S. Bakankar – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Nitin Bharadwaj, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Shagun Bhargava, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Revision Petitioner against the Respondent as detailed above, under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the Order dated 07.08.2019 of the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Bhopal (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in First Appeal (FA) No. 294 of 2018, in which the Order dated 04.09.2018 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gwalior (hereinafter referred to as the District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 16 of 2018 was challenged, inter alia, praying for setting aside the Impugned Order dated 07.08.2019 passed by the State Commission and allow the prayers made in CC No. 16 of 2018, filed by the Revision Petitioner.

2. While the Revision Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant) was the Appellant and the Respondent Bank (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) was the Respondent in the said FA before the State Commission, the Revision Petitioner was the Complainant and the Respondent was the Opposite Party before the District Forum in CC No. 16 of 2018. Notice was issued to the Bank 06.02.2020. The Parties filed written argument

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top