SUBHASH CHANDRA
Sadhna Shanker, MemberM/s. Universal Infrastructure – Appellant
Versus
Ravinder Kaur Bedi – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. Sadhna Shanker, Member—The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by M/s Universal Infrastructure (hereinafter referred to as the “builder”) assailing the Order dated 03.06.2019 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh, Punjab (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Complaint No. 39 of 2019 whereby the complaint filed by the complainants was partly allowed.
2. There is a delay of 110 days in filing the present appeal.
In the interest of justice and considering the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
3. The facts, in brief, are that the complainant, who was an NRI, was allotted a Flat No. 1001, Block Lyra, category 4-BHK, location 1th, Floor 10 in “The Taj Towers” located at Sector 104, Pearl City, Mohali and for which the complainant paid the total amount of Rs. 78,45,360/- to the builder. As per the agreement dated 17.08.2016 executed between the builder and the complainant, cost of the flat was Rs.65,60,000/-. It is alleged that the builder put the date on possession letter as 11.03.2016 wherea
Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust vs. Unique Shanti Developers and Ors.
Wing Commander Arifur Rahman Khan and Aleya Sultana and Ors. vs. DLF Southern Homes Pvt. Ltd.
In the event of failure to give possession of flat as agreed, purchaser is entitled to approach Consumer Commission.
In the event of failure to give possession of flat as agreed, purchaser is entitled to approach Consumer Commission.
Commercial Purpose - Mere allegation, that the purchase of the property is for commercial purpose, cannot be the ground to reject the present consumer complaint.
(1) Civil court - the case of the complainants is falling under ‘housing category’ and does not involves any complication question of facts, which can easily be decided by this commission and the mat....
Party payment - The complainant undoubtedly is entitled to be duly compensated for the loss and injury inflicted upon him. He is also entitled to a flat in lieu of which he had made part payment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.