SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Brij Mohan – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Salil Paul, Advocate

ORDER

Sudip Ahluwalia, Member—The present Revision Petition under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by Petitioner against the impugned Order dated 09.04.2015 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, in First Appeal No. 19 of 2013 vide which the Appeal filed by the Respondent No. 1/Insurance Company Appeal was allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the Complainant purchased a Mediclaim Policy bearing No. 360701/34/10/11/00000314 from the Insurance Company for the period from 10.11.2010 to 09.11.2011 and Respondent No. 2/TPA was appointed as Third Party Administrator for verification of the treatments. On 02.02.2011, the Complainant suddenly lost vision in his left eye and he immediately rushed to Dr. Som Nath Singla at Singla Nursing and Eye Hospital, Kotkapura, where he was admitted as an indoor patient on the same day. He was examined by the said Doctor and was diagnosed as suffering from ‘vitreous haemorrhage’ in the left eye. He was further told that some blood clot had affected the vision of the left eye. He was prescribed some medicines and was discharged on 03.02.2011, having spent Rs. 3,880/- during the treatment a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top