SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MUKESH V. SHARMA, SATISH A. MUNDE
Nutan Rajesh Shelat – Appellant
Versus
Shah Group Builders Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Advocate Sajira Jondhale i/b Uday Wavikar, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties: None present

JUDGMENT

Dr. Satish A. Munde, Member—The Complainants have filed this Complaint u/s 34 (1) (We think this is typographical mistake. We don’t have jurisdiction u/s 34 (1). Hence, we treat it u/s 47 (1)) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as ‘said Act’) claiming themselves as Consumers u/s 2(7)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Opposite Party No.1 is a Private Limited Company of which Opposite Parties Nos.2 to 4 are the Directors. The Complainants have alleged non-compliance of contractual and statutory obligations by the Opposite Parties and thereby committing deficiency in service and unfair trade practice within the meaning of Section 2(11) and 2(47) of the said Act.

2. The brief facts of the Consumer Complaint are as under—

The Complainants had booked Flat No. D/807, 8th Floor, D Wing, in the project known as ‘Shah Kingdom’ situated at Plot Nos.23, 24, 25, and 26 in Sector 20, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by making advance payment of Rs.10 lakhs vide cheque dated 20/07/2016 drawn on HDFC Bank out of total consideration of Rs.1,51,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore Fifty-One Lakhs Only) vide receipt dated 20/07/2016 issued by the Opposite Parties. After booki

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top