SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJAN SHARMA, BIMLA KUMARI
Jitendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
ILD Millennium Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Manu Prakash Upadhyay, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Abhishek Pal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rajan Sharma, Member (Judicial)—The present Consumer Complaint has been filed on 04.10.2017 before this Commission under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Complainant, seeking the following reliefs:—

“(i) Direct the Opposite Parties to hand over the peaceful and actual physical possession of the Complainant’s booked flat. Or

(i) Direct the Opposite Parties to refund the entire amount paid by the Complainant i.e. Rs.32,16,722/- along with simple interest @ 18% p.a.

(ii) Direct the Opposite Parties to compensate the Complainant @ Rs.5 per sq. ft. of super area per month till the date of possession.

(iii) Direct the Opposite Parties to pay Rs.4,71,361/- i.e. for interest paid by the Complainant till July 2017 on the home loan from HDFC Bank.

(iv) Direct the Opposite Parties to pay a compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- for the mental agony and harassment cause to the Complainant.

(v) Direct the Opposite Parties to pay a sum of Rs.55,000/- towards litigation expenses;

(vi) Direct the Opposite Parties to pay the Loyalty discount for the year 2009 & 2010 i.e. Rs.58,575/- as promised by the Opposite Parties and also refund the wrongly charged service ta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top