SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A. C. RAVAL
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Patel Hiral Raghunath – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants: Mr. N.M. Shinroja L.A.
For the Opponents: Mr. R.U. Nahar L.A.

ORDER

A.C. Raval, Presiding Member—The appellants – original respondents have filed this appeal under section 15 of the consumer protection Act being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order dated 07.10.2015 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ahmedabad City (hereinafter referred to as “learned District Forum”) in Consumer Complaint No.13 of 2015.

2. Heard learned advocate Mr. N.M. Shinroja for the appellants – original respondents and also heard learned advocate Mr. R.U. Nahar for the opponents – original complainant.

Facts of the case:

3. It is the case of the complainant that complainant no.2, who is the father of complainant no.1, has taken the mediclaim policy from the Oriental Insurance Company on 14.11.2005. It is continuously renewed till 2008-09 without any break. Thereafter, complainant no.1 became major and policy was taken in his name for the period from 14.11.2009 to 13.11.2010 insured with United India Insurance Company Ltd. In the said policy, renewal number is mentioned of the previous insurance company’s policy. Thereafter, policy was renewed with the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., for the period from 14.11.2010 to 19.11.2011. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top