SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJAN SHARMA, BIMLA KUMARI
Rakesh Khurana – Appellant
Versus
Exact Developers & Promoters Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Brig Anil Srivastava, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Dr. Bipin K. Dwivedi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rajan Sharma, Member (Judicial)—Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present complaint are that the Opposite Party came with an advertisement of dwelling project “The Ace.” Being lured by the advertisement, the Complainant had made total payment of Rs.18,75,000/- to the Opposite Party between the period February-March 2007, against which the Opposite Party had also issued receipts dated 20.02.2007 & 19.03.2007 to the Complainants. The Opposite Party vide communication dated 09.04.2007 (Annexure-C4) sent a provisional allotment letter of commercial unit no. 308 admeasuring of 1119 sq. ft. in the abovesaid project to the Complainants. However, in the communication dated 09.04.2007, the Opposite Party made it clear to the Complainants that in case the Complainants fail to send signed copy of the allotment letter within 30 days from the date of issuance of this communication, the offer of allotment would be deemed to be cancelled and the money deposited by the Complainants would be refunded by the Opposite Party within a reasonable time and without any interest after deduction of earnest money.

2. It has been stated by the Complainants that they did not sign the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top