SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AVM J. RAJENDRA
Shrikrushna Godghate – Appellant
Versus
Tiwari Land Developers Corporation – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. S. S. Pandey, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Ashish R. Rathi, Advocate

ORDER

These twenty Revision Petitions No.1690 to 1709 of 2019 have been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) by the Petitioners/ Complainants challenging the Impugned orders dated 16.03.2019, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Nagpur Circuit bench (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), pertaining to twenty First Appeal Nos. A/18/120 to A/18/138 & A/18/177. The State Commission, in response to these twenty Appeals filed by the Petitioners/Complainants, partly upheld the impugned orders. However, it modified clause No.2 of the operative part, specifically altering the interest rate from 4% p.a. to 12% p.a. on the refunded amount, while affirming the remaining portions of the order issued on 30.12.2017 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Wardha (referred to as the “District Forum”), in the twenty Consumer Complaints lodged by the Original Complainants.

2. There was a delay of 25 days in the filing of these twenty Revision Petitions. For the reasons stated in the applications and in the interest of justice, the delay is condoned.

3. Since the facts and que

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top