SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AVM J. RAJENDRA
Anant Raj Limited – Appellant
Versus
Happy Yadav – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vashishtha Parashar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. L.N. Rao and Mr. S.R. Malik, Advocates

ORDER

This Revision Petition No.1112 of 2020 challenges the impugned order of Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur (‘the State Commission’) dated 12.02.2020. Vide this order, the State Commission dismissed the First Appeal No. 111/2020 and affirmed the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Alwar (‘the District Forum’) dated 10.12.2019.

2. Brief facts of the case, as per the Complainant, are that the Petitioner/OP launched a residential scheme in the year 2012 namely ASHREY at Neemrana Alwar, Rajasthan. The Complainant submitted his application with the Petitioner/OP for booking Flat No. E-328 for a total sale consideration of Rs.8,89,769/- and deposited Rs.81,500/- on 09.02.2012. Thereafter, on 19.04.2012 he deposited Rs.85,697/-, on 31.07.2012 a sum of Rs.50,000/-, Rs.50,000/-, Rs.50,000/-, on 28.08.2012, a sum of Rs.18,038, on 06.12.2012, a sum of Rs.50,000/-, Rs.50,000/-, on 14.12.2012, a sum of Rs.8,616/- and on 20.05.2014, a sum of Rs.1,68,037/- were deposited. Thus, he paid a total of Rs.6,11,888/-. The Petitioner/OP was to deliver possession of the flat within three years from the date of booking. However, the OP failed to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top