Kanpur Development Authority Through Vice-Chairman Moti Jheel VS Pawan Kumar Pandey

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SUBHASH CHANDRA, J. RAJENDRA
Kanpur Development Authority Through Vice-Chairman Moti Jheel – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Kumar Pandey – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Advocate (VC)
For the Respondent:Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate

ORDER

Subhash Chandra, Presiding Member—This Revision Petition has been filed under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, “the Act”) challenging order dated 19.04.2017 of the Rajasthan State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench, Bikaner (in short, the ‘State Commission’) dismissing Appeal No. 81 of 2012 confirming the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bikaner (in short, “District Forum”) in Consumer Complaint No. 109 of 2011 dated 19.04.2012.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and given careful consideration to the material placed on record and the arguments urged before us.

3. The delay of 27 days in the filing of the revision petition had been condoned on 06.02.2018 subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent. The delay of 27 days in the filing of the revision petition was considered in light of the application seeking condonation of delay. The application was allowed in the interest of justice and the delay condoned.

4. The relevant facts of this case, in brief, are that respondent deposited Rs.96,000/- on 19.03.2008 with the petitioner for allotment of a Category A plot under the Highway Ci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document