SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SAROJ YADAV
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Valmik Ramesh Patil – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petition has been filed under Section 58(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 by the petitioner/opposite party being aggrieved of the order dated 20.08.2025, passed by the learned Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bench at Nashik (for short the ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 960 of 2018, arising out of the Order dated 04.09.2018, passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jalgaon (for short the ‘District Forum) in Consumer Complaint No. 124 of 2017, against the concurrent findings given by both the foras below.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that both the foras below have committed an error in ignoring the fact that the driver, who was driving the vehicle in question, did not possess a valid driving license on the date of accident i.e. 26.05.2016. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the following two case laws:—

1. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Suresh Chandra Aggarwal, 2009 ACJ 2697 dated 10.07.2009;

2. National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Girish & Ors. Revision Petition No.958 of 2020 decided on 07 J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top