SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH
Shrivari Sono Scans – Appellant
Versus
B Sureshan T. M – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Chandrashekhar Chakalabbi, Proxy Counsel (With Authority)
For the Respondent:Mr. Roy Paul, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent as detailed above, under section 58(1)(B) of Consumer Protection Act 2019, against the order dated 18.04.2023 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kerala (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 41/2021 in which order dated 29.01.2021 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kasaragod (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 173/2019 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 18.04.2023 passed by the State Commission and order dated 29.01.2021 passed by the District Forum.

2. The Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as Opposite Party) was Appellant before the State Commission and Opposite Party before the District Forum and the Respondent (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Respondent before the State Commission in FA/41/2021 and Complainant before the District Forum in Complaint No. 173/2019.

3. Notice was issued to the Respondent on 31.08.2023. Parties filed Written Arguments on 12.12.2023 (Petitioner) and 14.12.2023 and 29.01.2024 (Respondent)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top