RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, BHARATKUMAR PANDYA
Sri Pathy Assoceates Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Branch Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Bharatkumar Pandya, Member.—This complaint involves allegation of deficiency in service of insurance company with regard to repudiation of two insurance claims under Contractors All Risk Insurance Policy issued by OP M/s National Insurance Co.
2. The complainant is a contractor firm which was awarded contract for construction of breakwater and its approaches for fishing harbor by Government of Tamil Nadu at Thengapattinam at Kanyakumari for a total contractor value of Rs.27,62,60,930/-. The contract involved construction/erection of breakwater having, broadly, a ‘core’ to be fortified by primary armor of specially shaped and patented technology ‘CORE-LOC’ units, and, secondary armor of specified shape, size and weights of specified sourced stones and with laying of ‘berm’ at the base. As a part of the contract work, the complainant was also required to use CORE-LOC, a patented product of M/s Concrete Layer Innovations (CLI). As per agreement, the project was to be executed as per the design, terms and conditions and to be monitored by the Fisheries Department of Government of Tamil Nadu and under technical assistance from CLI. The design for the breakwater project was made by t
Sri Venkateshawara Syndicate vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Insurance Policy – Multiple Claims raised – Appointment of technical investigator before paying claims cannot be termed arbitrary or baseless & no illegality in insurer wanting to undertake technical....
Insurance Policy – Repudiation of claim – Surveyor;s report cannot be lightly brushed set aside & once survey report is not based on adhocism or is vitiated by arbitrariness, then jurisdiction of con....
Insurance companies must provide valid reasons based on evidence when rejecting surveyor assessments to avoid unjust repudiation of claims.
(1) Breach – The breach in the Dam was caused due to heavy rains and that was clearly covered under the Insurance claim. The deficiency in service by erroneously repudiating the claim is established.....
The Insurer must provide clear evidence for repudiation; mere allegations of defects do not suffice against documented damages.
(1) Exclusion clauses in insurance contracts are interpreted strictly and against insurer as they have effect of completely exempting insurer of its liabilities.(2) Insurance – Surveyor’s report is a....
Insurance companies cannot repudiate claims without substantial evidence proving defects in design or construction as supported by independent expert evaluations.
‘Reasonable precaution’ - Use of the term ‘reasonable precaution’ does not envisage for performance of impossible act.
Surveyor's report, while important, is not conclusive; claim exclusion must be proven by the insurer, particularly where there are indications of bias.
The court affirmed that damages due to inundation are covered under the insurance policy, and failure to provide policy terms invalidated the insurance company's repudiation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.