SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SRIKANT PANDEY, MONIKA MALIK
Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Balram Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants: Shri O. P. Samudrey, Learned Counsel
For the Respondent: Shri Shrikant Deshmukh, Learned Counsel

ORDER

Dr. (Mrs) Monika Malik, Member—This appeal by the opposite parties/appellants is directed against the order dated 02.05.2017 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bhopal (for short the ‘District Commission’) in C. C. No. 947/2016 whereby the complaint filed by the complainant/respondent is allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case as narrated by the complainant are that he after closing his bank account number 3443 ledger folio number 17/43 from the branch-Dhar Naka, Mhow, District-Indore he got transferred the deposited amount of Rs.20,081.35/- in the opposite party no.1-bank. It is alleged by the complainant that he repeatedly enquired about deposited amount from the opposite party no.1-bank, but the bank did not give him any details. Thereafter on 22.03.2016, 18.06.2016 and 13.08.2016 he made written request to the opposite parties but the opposite parties refused to give any information stating that the matter is old. The complainant therefore alleging deficiency in service on part of the bank filed a complaint before the District Commission seeking deposit of Rs.20,081/- along with compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- and costs of Rs.50,000/-.

3. The opposite

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top