HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. VS Rupkuwar Patel

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

INDER JIT SINGH
HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rupkuwar Patel – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Navneet Kumar, Advocate (Through VC) with Mr. Harsh Sharan, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1:Ms. Yashika Varshney, Advocate with Mr. Sameer Shrivastava, Advocate (Through VC)
For the Respondent No.2:Ms. Meenakshi S. Devgan, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 26.09.2019 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chhattisgarh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 18/645 in which order dated 21.05.2018 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 31/2018 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 26.092019 passed by the State Commission and for dismissing the Complaint filed by Respondent-1/complainant before the District Forum.

2. While the Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as OP-3/Insurance Company) was Appellant before the State Commission and OP-3 before the District Forum and the Respondent-1 (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Respondent-1 before the State Commission and Complainant before the District Forum and Respondent-2/HDFC Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Bank) were Respondent-2 before the State Commission in FA/18/645 and OPs- 1 & 2 before the Distric