SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH CHANDRA, J. RAJENDRA
Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
Kanchan Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Mohit Auluck, Advocate (VC)
For the Respondent:Ms. Namrata Chandorkar, Advocate (VC)

JUDGMENT

AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM VSM (Retd.), Member—This Revision Petition is filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act’), against order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, UP (State Commission) dated 02.03.2016 in First Appeal No.725 of 2013 allowing the Appeal against District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ambedkar Nagar, (District Forum) order in CC No.139/ 2007 dated 24.01.2013, wherein the District Forum rejected the complaint.

2. As per the Registry report, there is 15 days delay in filing the Revision Petition and in the interest of justice, the delay is condoned.

3. For the convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the original Complaint filed before the District Forum.

4. Brief facts of the case, as per the complainant, are that she is the wife of the deceased Pramod Kumar Singh, who obtained a life insurance policy for Rs.1,00,000 under Policy No.213842779, Table No.75-20, on 25.09.2003. The policy required a half-yearly premium payment of Rs.3,213, which was duly paid up to 26.02.2005 as per the terms set by the OP, the Life Insurance Corporation of India. The deceased had paid the premiums as per policy rul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top