SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BIMLA KUMARI
Pradeep Tokas – Appellant
Versus
Terra Realcon Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Prem Garg, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Ms. Anchal Jindal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Brief facts of the case are that in the month of August 2013, the representatives of the Opposite Party approached the Complainant and stated that the Opposite Party is going to construct the residential flats in its project, namely, ‘Terra Heritage’ at Bhiwadi, Rajasthan. Being lured by the representations made by the Opposite Party, the Complainant vide ‘Application Form dated 06.08.2013 (Annexure-A Page 22 & 23 of complaint) had booked the 2BHK flat bearing no. D-801 admeasuring 1150 sq. ft. in the aforesaid project of the Opposite Party. As per the Application Form, the basic sale price of the flat was Rs.27,28,320.

2. It is the case of Complainant that at the time of booking, the Opposite Party assured the Complainant that the project would be completed within 36 months from the date of agreement and if, in any case, the Opposite Party failed to handover the possession within 36 months, then the Opposite Party would refund the entire money along with 24% interest. The Opposite Party further stated that if the Complainant cancels the booking then the Opposite Party would be entitled to deduct 10% of the amount paid by the Complainant. On the said term, the Complainant en

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top