SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PINKI
A. P. Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Parsvnath Developers Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant: Mr. Ravi Dagar, Counsel
For the Opp. Party: Mr. T.P. Chauhan, Counsel

JUDGMENT

Pinki, Member (Judicial)—The brief facts necessary for deciding the present complaint are that the son of Complainant was working at Indore and the Complainant and his wife, namely, Mrs. Neeraj Sharma, with a view to construct their house and residing with their son in the old age, had booked a residential plot with the Opposite Party in its project namely ‘Parsvnath City’ at Indore, Madhya Pradesh. On 30.01.2008, ‘Plot Buyers Agreement’ was executed between the Complainant and his wife and the Opposite Party for plot bearing No.M-233 admeasuring 172 sq. yards in the above said project. The basic price of the said plot was of Rs.9,28,800/-. As per clause 5(a) of the said agreement, the Opposite Party had agreed to complete the internal development work of the project within 24 months from the date of signing of the agreement subject to force majeure, restraints or restrictions from any courts/authorities, disputes with contractors/work force etc., circumstances beyond the control of the Developer and subject to timely payments by the Buyers.

2. It is further stated by the Complainant that between January, 2007 and February, 2009, he had paid a total amount of Rs.8,82,360/- t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top