M.S.PARIKH, S.B.MAJMUDAR
MISCELLANEOUS MAZDOOR SABHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Spl. C. A. is moved by Misc. Mazdoor Sabha through its Secretary on behalf of its members who were workmen working with respondent No. 3 at the relevant time. Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are joined as constituted attornies in charge of the said concern while respondent no. 6 is joined through its Managing Director being parent company whose wholly owned subsidiary is respondent No. 3 industries.
( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner-Union is that services of all the employees working with respondent No. 3-Company were terminated illegally on 3-2- 1988 by notice at Annexure b, without following the provisions of Sees. 25f, 25ffa, 25n and 25-0 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the Act for short) and Sec. 66 of the Bombay Shops and Establishment Act, 1948. Respondent No. 3 was registered as a private company on 20-12-1982. According to the petitioner, one of the objects of the company, as seen from the Articles of Association was to carry on business of manufacturing, preparing for market and/or selling and dealing in mosquito net and allied products. The manufacturing operation of mosquito nets was carried on by the Mosquito netting Plant managed by respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.