RAJESH H.SHUKLA
Satyadev Parasnath Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Rajesh H. Shukla, J.
1. The present petitions are filed by the respective petitioners for the prayer inter alia that appropriate writ, order or direction may be issued quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 23-10-2012 passed by respondent No. 3 - Corporation at Annexure-N and also quash and set aside the notification issued by respondent No. 1 - State dated 2-7-2012 on the grounds stated in the memo of petition. It is further prayed with regard to the interim relief for implementing the Draft Town Planning Scheme No. 62 (Dindoli-Bhestan-Bhedwad) in respect of Plot of the petitioners of both the petitions, i.e. Block No. 505 situated at village Dindoli, Taluka Choryasi, District Surat. Heard learned Counsel Shri S.P. Majmudar for the petitioners. Learned Counsel Shri Majmudar referred to the papers at length and submitted that as stated in detail in the written submissions, his main submissions are that the objections have not been considered as per order passed earlier in Special Civil Application No. 18812 of 2011 referred to in Special Civil Application No. 834 of 2014. Learned Counsel Shri Majmudar submitted that the objections or the representations of the p
Aligarh Muslim University v. Mansoor Ali Khan
Bhikhubhai Vithlabhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
Babulal Badriprasad Varma v. Surat Municipal Corporation
Jethabhai Mepabhai Makwana vs. State of Gujarat
K.L. Tripathi v. State Bank of India
Kashiben Wd/o. Pitamber Devchand v. State of Gujarat
Saiyed Mohamad v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation
Tukaram Kana Joshi Through Power of Attorney Holder v. M.I.D.C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.