SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 663

ASHOKKUMAR C.JOSHI
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
SIRAJAHMED ABDULKARIM MEMAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : MS. MAITHILI MEHTA, APP.
For The Respondent: MR JV JAPEE

JUDGMENT :

1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant – State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the judgment and order dated 20.12.2008, passed in Sessions Case No. 147 of 2006 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, Himmatnagar camp at Idar, recording the acquittal.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 13.01.2004 at about 19:00 hours complainant along with Head Constable Natvarsinh Shankarsinh, Buckle No. 610, Police Constable Vahidan Joravardan, Buckle No. 784, Police Constable Pravinbhai Nathabhai, Buckle No. 1316 and Police Constable – Kantibhai Punjabhai, Buckle No. 1079 were on petrolling on Vadali Khedbrahma Road. Further, as per the case of the prosecution, while they were returning from Vadali Khedbrahma Road, when they arrived near Shantinagar Society at about 21.00 hours, one Jeep was found lying near Shantinagar and two persons were standing near the Jeep and three persons were seen going towards Shantinagar in the light of Jeep. Therefore, the complainant proceeded towards them and seen in the light of battery, they were found with deadly weapons like Dhariya and Dhoka. It is further the case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top