R. M. CHHAYA, NIRZAR S. DESAI
ARCELORMITTAL NIPPON STEEL INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ESSAR BULK TERMINAL LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner – original applicant has challenged the order dated 16.7.2021 passed by the Commercial Court and learned 12th Additional District Judge, District and Sessions Court, Surat below interim application filed by the applicant in Commercial CMA no.2 of 2021.
As all documents including the material relied upon before the trial court is forming part of the record of this petition, we do not deem it fit to call for the original record and proceedings but to decide this petition on the basis of the record before us. The pleadings and documents which are relied upon by the parties before the trial court is part of the paper book. We have called for the original record and proceedings of IAAP 5 of 2021.
2. Following noteworthy facts emerge from the record of the petition:-
Lakshmi Rattan Engineering Works Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commission of Sales Tax
Martin & Harris Ltd. Vs. Additional District Judge & Ors. reported in (1998) 1 SCC 732
Ram Kishan Fauji Vs. State of Haryana
Radhe Shyam & Anr. Vs. Chhabi Nath & Ors.
Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr. Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil
Waryam Singh & Anr. Vs. Amarnath & Anr.
Ajay Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Chattisgarh & Anr. reported in (2017) 3 SCC 330
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
P. Radha Bai v. P. Ashok Kumar
Bharat Aluminium Company vs. Kaiser Aluminum Technical Services Inc reported in (2016) 4 SCC 126
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.