ARAVIND KUMAR, ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI
Vinod M. Bhatt, General Secretary – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Aravind Kumar, J.
1. The facts shorn off unnecessary details for consideration of this petition can be crystalised as under.
2. Petitioner is an Association said to have been incorporated for the welfare of its members, who are carrying on the business of manufacture of "pesticide formulation". A manufacturing license under Rule 9 of the Insecticides Rules, 1971 (for short, hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") made in accordance with the Insecticides Act, 1968 (for short, hereinafter referred to as "the Act") is required to be obtained for carrying on the business of manufacture of "pesticides formulation".
2.1 in this petition, challenge is laid to the validity of the Notification No.G.S.R.1229(E) dated 4.10.2017 issued by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare (Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare) [Annexure-A] whereunder the educational qualification prescribed for issuance of license for manufacturing "technical grade pesticides" and "pesticide formulation" came to be substituted.
3. We have heard Mr. Asim Pandya, learned Senior Advo
Competent Authority v. Barangore Jute Factory
ITC Bhadrachalam Paperboards and another v. Mandal Revenue official, A.P. and others
Kusum in gots & Alloys Ltd. v. Union of India
Nawabkhan Abbaskhan v. State of Gujarat
Rajendra Agricultural University v. Ashok Kumar Prasad and Others
Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. Rampur (UP) v. Municipal Board, Rampur
Syed Hasan Rasul Numa and others v. Union of India and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.