HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Simba Poultry and Coconut Farm – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 28.02.2018 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Porbandar in Regular Civil Suit No.105 of 1992 as well as the judgment and order dated 20.11.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Porbandar in Regular Civil Appeal No.07 of 2018, the appellant has filed the present second appeal.
2. Heard Mr. Vishal C. Mehta, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Adityasinh Jadeja, the learned AGP appearing for the respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 and perused the judgment and order passed by both the Courts below and also taken into account the material placed on record of the appeal.
3. Considering the above fact the First Appellate Court has to apply its mind independently and frame the issues appropriately and independently. The provisions of Order 41 of C.P.C. provides that how the Appellate Court has to deal with the Appeal under Section 96 of the Code and the procedure is to be followed as per Order 41 of C.P.C.
4. In the recent judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of K. Karuppuraj vs. M. Ganesan reported in 2021 (10) SCC 777, the Hon’ble Apex Court has held that while decid
Dumala Vahpara Gram Panchyat vs. Chunilal Tribhovandas Patel & Ors.
Mahmad Ahmadbhai vs. Fatmaben Abdulla & Ors.
Prajapati Abraham Nagarbhai & Anr. Vs. Prajapati Harjibhai & Ors.
Union of India and another Vs. Ranchhoddas and others
Babubhai Velani Vs. Rameshbhai Prajapati
Girijanandini Devi v. Bijendra Narain Choudhary
G. Amalorpavam v. R.C. Diocese of Madurai
Shiv Kumar Sharma v. Santosh Kumari
Gannmani Anasuya v. Parvatini Amarendra Chowdhari
B.V. Nagesh v. H.V. Sreenivasa Murthy
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. and the necessity for the First Appellate Court to independently assess the evidence, consid....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. by the First Appellate Court, emphasizing the need for independent assessment of evidence, f....
The First Appellate Court must comply with the mandatory requirements of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. and properly assess the evidence, apply its mind, and decide the case considering the material on r....
The First Appellate Court is obligated to comply with the provisions of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. and independently assess the evidence and consider the relevant points for adjudication.
The First Appellate Court is required to comply with the provisions of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. and decide the appeal in accordance with law on merits after framing points for determination as envi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C., emphasizing the need for the First Appellate Court to independently assess evidence and p....
The First Appellate Court must comply with the provisions of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. by independently assessing the evidence, formulating specific points for determination, and giving reasons for ....
The First Appellate Court is obligated to frame specific points for determination in accordance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the C.P.C. and to decide the appeal in adherence to the requirements of the sa....
The First Appellate Court's obligation to independently assess evidence and frame specific points for determination in accordance with Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. to ensure a judicial decision-making ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C., the requirement for the appellate court to independently assess the evidence, and the need ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.