Back
BIREN VAISHNAV
Ranjitsinh Raysinh Parmar – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned advocates for the petitioners.
2. The prayer in the petition is to consider the services of the petitioners from the date of their initial appointment and grant gratuity and pension accordingly as per the order passed by this court in Special Civil Application No. 8281 of 2014 dated 14.07.2015.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that they were working as daily wagers with the respondent for more than 25 years and a copy of statement showing their date of appointment, date of retirement etc is annexed to the petition.
4. The petitioners filed a petition before this court being Special Civil Application No. 8281 of 2014 whereby the court observed on 14.07.2015 as under :
6. In view of the aforesaid, this petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to calculate the amount towards the encashment of the unavailed privilege leave within a period of
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the period of 10 years as a daily wager should be considered for the grant of pension and gratuity, in accordance with relevant legal provi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a daily wager is entitled to pensionary benefits by counting the entire period of service from the date of entry until retirement, as per the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that daily wagers are entitled to pensionary benefits based on their continuous service and working days, as per the G.R. dated 17.10.1988 and Sect....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of daily wagers to pensionary benefits by counting the entire period of service as continuous under Section 25B of the Industrial D....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the benefits of pension to daily wagers should be calculated from the date of their initial appointments, as per the Government Resolution dat....
Point of law: Facts and the principles of law highlighted, render the inaction on part of the respondent authorities (a) in not extending the benefits of 6th Pay Commission to the petitioners; (b) in....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
