SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1425

NIRAL R. MEHTA
SUJATA SURAJ BHATIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : R.S. SANJANWALA, TARAK DAMANI.
For the Respondents: P.V. PATADIYA, MOXA THAKKAR.

Table of Content
1. special criminal application initiation context (Para 1)
2. factual incidents and background of the complaint (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. complaint procedural actions and outcomes (Para 14 , 15)
4. judicial examination of complaint validity (Para 16 , 17 , 20 , 21)
5. court's ruling and quashing of pocso proceedings (Para 24 , 25 , 26)

ORDER :

1. By way of this Special Criminal Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “the Cr.P.C.”) the petitioners-original accused persons sought to quash the proceedings arising from the Criminal Inquiry Case No. 2 of 2020 filed before the Special Court (POCSO), Surat as well as the order dated 31st August 2021, by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO), Surat issued summons under Section 204 of the Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable under Sections 323 , 354(b) and 114 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE read with Sections 7 , 8 and 11 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (for short

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top