N. V. ANJARIA, SAMIR J. DAVE
Apollo Parker Construction Equipments Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ammann India Priavate Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[N.V. ANJARIA, J.]
1. Both these Appeals from Order preferred by the original defendants, arise from common order dated 17.0.2022 passed by learned 6th Additional District Judge, Commercial Court, Mehsana, below application exhibit 5 read with exhibit 5(A) in Trademark Suit No. 1 of 2021. The Appeals from Order were heard together and are treated for disposal by this common judgment.
1.2 By impugned order, the Commercial Court below granted injunction against the defendants-appellants herein restraining them from using trademark ‘Apollo’ or any identical or deceptively similar trademark for manufacturing, marketing, promoting, etc., the goods of the plaintiff as mentioned in paragraph 21 of the application and thereby restraining the defendants from infringing plaintiff's trademark ‘Apollo’.
1.2.1 Injunction was granted against the defendants-appellants also in respect of using the said trademark "Apollo" in respect of the goods in question, thereby, restraining them from committing the act of passing off by misrepresenting and causing deception amongst the purchasers and traders.
2. The appellants of Appeal from Order No. 51 of 2022 are Apollo Infratech Pvt. Ltd. and Patel
Mahendra and Mahendra Paper Mills Limited Vs. Mahendra and Mehendra Limited
S. Syed Mohideen Vs. P. Sulochana Bai
Khodey Distillers Ltd. vs. Scotch Whiskey Association & Ors.
Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma vs. Navratna Pharmaceuticals Laboratories
Midas Hygienic Vs. Sudhir Bhatia
Ruston & Hornsby Ltd. vs. Zamindara Engineering Co.
Rupa & Co. Ltd. vs. Dawnmills Company Ltd
Vikram Stores vs. S.N. Perfumary and Anr.
M/s. Jindal Industries Ltd. vs. M/s. Nirmal Steel Tubes Pvt. Ltd.
Poddar Tyres Ltd. vs. Bedrock Sales Corporation Ltd.
Wander Ltd. vs. Antox India Pvt. Ltd.
Cadila Health Care Limited Vs. Cadila Pharmaceutical Limited
SM Dychem Limited Vs. Cadbury India Limited
Registrar of Trademarks v. Ashokchandra Rakhit Ltd.
Corn Products Refining Company Vs. Shangrilla Food Products
M/s. Nandhini Delux Vs. M/s. Karnataka Cooperative Milk
Milmet Oftho Industries vs. Allergan Inc.
The court emphasized likelihood of consumer confusion in trademark law, holding that similar marks can infringe established trademarks regardless of differences in service or field, thus supporting t....
The court found that despite phonetic similarity, the distinctiveness of trade marks and differences in intended consumer bases negate the likelihood of confusion and passing off.
Point of Law : Section 27 of Trade Marks Act provides that no action for infringement will lie in respect of an unregistered trade mark.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.