BIREN VAISHNAV
High Court Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Gujarat Information Commission – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The High Court of Gujarat on its administrative side has filed this petition with a prayer that the action of the respondent no.1 i.e. Gujarat Information Commission directing the petitioner to provide information and documents to the remaining points, available be declared as illegal and violative of the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short ‘the Act’). A further direction is prayed to quash and set aside the judgment dated 23.06.2016 passed by the respondent No.1 in Appeal No.769 of 2014.
2. Facts in brief indicate that the respondent no.2 who is a Judicial Officer submitted an application on 17.02.2014, seeking information in reference to 21 points. The application was received by the Public Information Officer on 18.02.2014. On 19.02.2014 a money order was received. Thereafter, the Public Information Officer initiated a correspondence with the concerned department for collecting the information as sought for by the respondent no.2 that involved a considerable time.
3. Aggrieved by the action of the Public Information Officer, the respondent no.2 filed First Appeal No.37 of 2014 on 11.04.2014 before the Appellate Authority. He contended that info
Center for Earth Sciences Studies vs. Anson Sebastian reported in 2010(2) KLT 233
Central Board of Secondary Education and another v. Aditya Bandopadhyay and others (2011) 8 SCC 497
Canara Bank v. C.S. Shyam and Ors. reported in AIR 2017 SC 4040
Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. Cen. Information Commr. and ors reported in (2013) 1 SCC 212
Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. Cen. Information Commr. And Ors. reported in (2013) 1 SCC 212.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.