JUDGMENT :

1. Since the common question and issue is involved in the captioned writ petitions, the same are analogously heard and decided by the common judgment.

2. Issue RULE. Learned advocate Mr. Chauhan waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents.

3. The case of the petitioners is that the Labour Court, Anand has erroneously and illegally rejected the Recovery Applications filed by the workmen claiming the differential amount of D.A. and increments rendered by each of the workman from 31.10.2003 till 24.05.2004.

4. Since, the petitioners were not paid the amount of D.A and increments for the aforesaid period, they filed recovery applications in the year 2006. The Labour Court, Anand partly allowed the same vide orders dated 06.04.2015, which was subject matter of challenge before this Court in writ petitions being Special Civil Application Nos.15096 of 2015 and allied matters filed by the respondent–Corporation. By the order dated 25.04.2018, the writ petitions were allowed, by setting aside the order of the Labour Court, and the matters were remanded to the Labour Court with a liberty to raise all available contentions of both the sides. After the remand, the Labo