S. H. VORA, SANDEEP N. BHATT
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Gandabhai Motibhai Rathod – Respondent
ORDER :
SANDEEP N. BHATT, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 04.01.2021 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Morbi in Sessions Case No. 60 of 2016 whereby the respondent accused came to be acquitted for the offences punishable under sections 325, 326, 114, 504 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred as ‘IPC’ for short), the applicant – State of Gujarat has preferred this application to grant leave to appeal under section 378(1)(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (‘the Code’ for short).
2. The facts in nutshell which give rise to the present leave to appeal as well as appeal is as under:-
2.1 As per the case of the prosecution on 09.10.2009, at around 09:00 hours, the buffaloes of complainant were drinking water from the pond at Village Sapkada and the complainant was waiting there as the caretaker of the livestock. At that point of time, the accused person who is also the owner of the buffaloes was present there and his buffaloes also needed to drink water from the pond. The complainant told the accused person to wait till the buffa
Bhaiyamiyan Alias Jardar Khan and Another vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in (2011) 6 SCC 394
Mohan @ Srinivas @ Seena @ Tailor Seena V/s. State of Karnataka
Ramesh Babulal Doshi V. State of Gujarat (1996) 9 SCC 225
Rajesh Singh & Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2011) 11 SCC 444
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity of compelling evidence to overturn such judgments.
The appellate court cannot substitute its own view in an acquittal appeal unless the findings of the trial court are demonstrably unsustainable.
The judgment underscores the principle of presumption of innocence, the requirement for clear and convincing evidence to establish guilt, and the reluctance to disturb a finding of acquittal without ....
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal due to insufficient evidence, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the principle that two reasonable views should not disturb the trial ....
An appellate court must respect acquittals and only intervene if the trial court's judgment is legally erroneous or misinterprets evidence, maintaining the presumption of innocence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.