Back
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Patel Mahendrakumar Prahladbhai – Respondent
ORDER :
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J.
1. This is an appeal, filed by the appellant-State under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, challenging the common judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge, Dated: 27.06.2022, in Special Civil Application No. 5948 of 2021 and the allied matters.
2. The factual matrix of the present case are as under; Pursuant to the issuance of Advertisement No. 1/2021 by the appellant-State for recruitment to the post of Shiksan Sahayak in non-governmental grant-in-aid Higher Secondary Schools within the State, the Opponent, herein, i.e. the petitioner in Special Civil Application No. 6207 of 2021, applied for the same by filling-up online form.
2.1 The qualification of the Opponent is post graduation from Swami Vivekanand Mahavidyalaya, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh.
2.2 The opponent was called for document verification. At the time of document verification, she produced migration certificate, transfer certificate, bona fide certificate, degree certificate, NCTE recognition letters etc. to demonstrate that he had undertaken the study of M.Ed. at the concerned college/University. However, the appellant-State did not consider the same, as valid and he was denied appointm
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the authority to consider the qualifications of candidates as per the advertisement requirements and the limitations on justifyin....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the impermissibility of justifying decisions with subsequent actions and the need for compliance with advertisement guidelines.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the grounds stated in an order and not supplementing them with fresh reasons, as well as the need to examine the validity of an order based on the r....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the validity of an order must be judged by the reasons mentioned at the time of the order and cannot be supplemented by fresh reasons later. A....
The validity of an order must be judged based on the reasons stated, and it is impermissible to supplement the reasons with subsequent actions or affidavits.
The validity of an order must be judged by the reasons mentioned and cannot be supplemented by fresh reasons.
The validity of an authority's decision must be judged based on the reasons stated and cannot be supplemented by subsequent actions.
A candidate's eligibility should not be disregarded based on the absence of an original degree certificate if valid proof of graduation, such as a Grade Card, is submitted before the application dead....
The judgment establishes the principle that in the absence of a specific provision in the advertisement, there is a presumption that only the experience earned after acquiring the degree would be cou....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
