IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ASHUTOSH SHASTRI, J. C. DOSHI, JJ.
Adani Power Maharashtra Limited – Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(1)(1) – Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 346 Of 2022
Decided On : 01-05-2023
Income Tax - Assessment Reopening - Section 148 - Section 37 - Section 135 of the Companies Act - [CSR Expenses] - [Income Tax Act, Section 148, Section 37, Section 135] - The court quashed the impugned notice and order as the reopening of assessment lacked subjective satisfaction and independent application of mind. The court emphasized that expenditure incurred on corporate social responsibility activities under Section 135 of the Companies Act is not to be treated as expenditure for the purposes of business under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. The court cited legal provisions and previous decisions to support its conclusion.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a limited company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17, declaring a total loss. The respondent issued a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, calling for the submission of the return of income and subsequently passed an order rejecting the petitioner's objections. The petitioner challenged the notice and order, contending that the expenses incurred for corporate social responsibility were allowable and that the reopening lacked subjective satisfaction and independent application of mind.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the reopening of assessment lacked subjective satisfaction and independent application of mind, citing previous decisions and legal provisions to support its conclusion. The court held that the expenditure incurred on corporate social responsibility activities is not to be treated as expenditure for the purposes of business.
Issues: The issues revolved around the validity of the notice and order, the allowability of expenses for corporate social responsibility, and the requirement of subjective satisfaction and independent application of mind for assessment reopening.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the lack of subjective satisfaction and independent application of mind in the assessment reopening, as well as the interpretation of legal provisions regarding the treatment of expenses for corporate social responsibility.
Final Decision: The court quashed the impugned notice dated 21.03.2021 and the impugned order dated 25.10.2021, thereby allowing the petition.
ORDER :
(Ashutosh Shastri, J.)
1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the impugned notice dated 21.03.2021 at Annexure-A as well as for setting aside the impugned order dated 25.10.2021.
2. The brief facts leading to rise of present petition is that petitioner is a limited company and all the shareholders are the citizens of India and as such, amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court. The petitioner submitted its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 28.11.2016 declaring total loss of Rs.1206,52,27,424/- under the normal provisions and book profit of Rs.0/-. The return of the petitioner was processed and the case of the petitioner was selected for scrutiny under CASS. On furnishing information, detailed scrutiny was undertaken and later on, on 22.12.2018, the assessment order under Section 143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) came to be passed assessing total loss of the petitioner at Rs.1181,07,09,327/- for Assessment Year 2016-17.
2.1. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent issued notice upon the petitioner under Section 148 of the Act on 21.03.2021 calling upon the petitioner to submit return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 without prejudice, & in due compliance of the said notice and consequently, for reopening has also sought approval obtained under Section 151 of the Act. The said reasons and the approval came to be supplied to the petitioner on 17.05.2021.
2.2. In response to the said reasons, the petitioner filed detailed objections on 16.08.2021 and questioned the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act. However, according to the petitioner, by brief satisfaction, objections raised by the petitioner came to be turned down on 25.10.2021 and order was supplied to the petitioner. The petitioner on account of such action by the respondent authority aggrieved by the impugned notice dated 21.03.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Act as well as order passed upon the objections of the petitioner dated 25.10.2021, is constrained to approach this Court by way of present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
3. Pursuant to the notice issued by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, after pleadings having been completed, the matter is requested to be taken by for hearing and as such, we have heard Mr. B.S. Soparkar, learned advocate who represented the petitioner and Ms. Maithili Mehta, learned advocate who represented the respondent authority.
4. Mr. B.S. Soparkar, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has vehemently contended that the impugned notice as well as the order passed by the respondent authority are patently erroneous and in conflict with the fundamental rights of the petitioner under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and hence, same are required to be quashed and set aside. It has been submitted that perusal of the reasons recorded, the main substantial reason is to the effect that income has escaped assessment since claim of CSR expenses made by the petitioner of Rs.4,05,629/- was not allowable and as such, requires to be disallowed and to that extent, the income has escaped assessment and thus, according to learned advocate Mr. Soparkar, is fundamentally erroneous, since expenses are incurred voluntarily, wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business and therefore, there is no question of escapement of income from the assessment.
4.1. Learned advocate Mr. Soparkar has further contended that in view of explanation 2 attached to Section 37 of the Act, any expenditure incurred on the activities relating to corporate social responsibility referred to in Section 135 of the Companies Act, shall not be deemed to be expenditure incurred for the purposes of business. As per Section 135 of the Companies Act, at least two per cent of the average net profit made during three immediately preceding fina
Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s Lucas T.V.S. Ltd. (2001) 117 Taxman 366 (SC)
CIT Vs Lucas T V S Ltd (2001) 168 CTR (SC) 311 : (2001) 249 ITR 306 (SC)
Adani Exports Vs Dy CIT (1999) 153 CTR (Guj ) 308: (1999) 240 ITR 224 (Guj)
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the expenditure incurred on corporate social responsibility activities under Section 135 of the Companies Act is not to be treated as expendit....
Point of Law : Sufficiency of the evidence or material is not open to scrutiny by the Court but the existence of the belief is the sine qua non for a valid exercise of power.
Reopening of assessment under the Income Tax Act after four years is impermissible without failure to disclose material facts; mere change of opinion does not justify such action.
Reopening of assessment under the Income Tax Act requires tangible new material; mere change of opinion is insufficient.
The court emphasized the need for tangible material to believe that income had escaped assessment and held that the power to grant approval for re-opening an assessment is coupled with a duty and can....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the reopening of assessment should be based on the availability of tangible material and not on a mere change of opinion of the Assessing Offi....
Assessee’s objections raised against the reopening proceedings are not acceptable as the case warrants scrutiny on the same lines. Accordingly, the objections so raised are hereby disposed off accord....
Reassessment under Income Tax Act is impermissible on issues already addressed in a completed assessment, as it constitutes a change of opinion without new material evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.