IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, JJ.
RAM KISHAN KHOIWAL – Appellant
Versus
COTTON CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED – Respondent
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1470 of 2018, Special Civil Application No. 16117 of 2016
Decided On : 27-02-2023
False Information - Employment Termination - Advertisement Clause 14, 23 - The court upheld the termination of employment based on the false information provided by the petitioner in the online application form, as it was found to be in violation of the eligibility criteria mentioned in the advertisement. The court referred to relevant clauses of the advertisement and emphasized that if false or incomplete information is supplied, the candidature/appointment can be cancelled/terminated. The court also cited previous Supreme Court decisions to support its decision.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner applied for the post of Junior Cotton Purchaser in response to a public advertisement by the respondent-Corporation. After being selected and issued an appointment letter, the petitioner's services were terminated due to alleged false information provided in the application form and experience certificate.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had provided incorrect information in the online application form and the experience certificate, which was in violation of the eligibility criteria mentioned in the advertisement. The court upheld the termination of the petitioner's employment based on the false information provided.
Issues: The main issue was whether the termination of the petitioner's employment based on the false information provided in the application form and experience certificate was justified.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the relevant clauses of the advertisement, which stated that if false or incomplete information is supplied, the candidature/appointment can be cancelled/terminated. The court also cited previous Supreme Court decisions to support its decision, emphasizing that providing false information in the application form amounts to moral turpitude and can lead to termination of services.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the termination of the petitioner's employment, ruling that the learned Single Judge had not committed any error in dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner.
JUDGMENT :
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J.
1. The appellant-original petitioner has filed present appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the impugned judgment and order dated 21.06.2018 rendered by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 16117 of 2016 whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the petition filed by the original petitioner.
2. Brief facts leading to the present appeal are as under:
2.2 The petitioner, therefore, filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority of the respondent-Corporation, however, the Appellate Authority vide order dated 18.04.2016 dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner filed review application which came to be rejected by the Chairman-Cum-Managing Director vide order dated 19.07.2016 and hence, the petitioner preferred the captioned petition before this Court. It is stated that the learned Single Judge, while passing the impugned judgment and order dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner and, therefore, the petitioner has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent.
3. Heard Mr.Harsheel Shukla, learned advocate appearing for the appellant and Mr.Mehul Mehta, learned advocate appearing for the respondent.
4. Mr.Shukla, learned advocate appearing for the appellant, at the outset, has referred to the advertisement issued by the respondent-Corporation inviting application for the post of Junior Cotton Purchaser. It is submitted by learned advocate for the appellant that as per the said advertisement, the qualification and experience for the said post were specifically stated in the advertisement itself. It is pointed out from the advertisement that the concerned candidates should provide post qualification experience of minimum one year of dealing in any Ag
Providing false information in the application form and experience certificate, in violation of the eligibility criteria mentioned in the advertisement, can lead to termination of employment.
Intentional suppression of employment information in a job application can lead to disqualification and cancellation of appointment offers.
The judgment establishes the principle that in the absence of a specific provision in the advertisement, there is a presumption that only the experience earned after acquiring the degree would be cou....
Dismissals from service upheld due to misconduct; appointments not conferring rights due to violation of recruitment procedures. Legality and fairness in employment processes must align with statutor....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.