Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Lakshmi Narayan Singh, S/o Sri Satya Narayan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Steel Authority of India Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of case details and factual background. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. overview of writ applications and relief sought. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. disciplinary actions taken against petitioners. (Para 20 , 24) |
| 4. arguments presented by petitioners' counsel. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. court's reasoning regarding the illegality of appointments. (Para 34 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 6. final decision and dismissal of writ applications. (Para 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT :
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. Since common question of law and fact are involved in these writ applications they are being disposed of by this common order.
3. Before embarking on a threadbare discussion of the cases at hand it would be necessary to spell out the factual narration of each of these writ applications.
W.P.(S) No. 3297 of 2015
4. The petitioner in this writ application has prayed for the following reliefs:
(i) To quash/set aside the order dated 8th May 2015 passed by learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Circuit Bench, Ranchi (Patna Bench, Patna) in O.A. No. 150 of 2014, whereby and whereunder, the original application (O.A.) filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.
(i
Dismissals from service upheld due to misconduct; appointments not conferring rights due to violation of recruitment procedures. Legality and fairness in employment processes must align with statutor....
Irregular daily wager appointments without advertisement violate Articles 14 & 16; no regularization or reinstatement even with prior equal pay directions; termination upheld as backdoor entries depr....
The court ruled that an FIR may be quashed if allegations do not disclose an offence, emphasizing prior judicial validation of the recruitment process.
Termination of employment without following the principles of natural justice, especially when the employee has a valid appointment, is unlawful and discriminatory.
(1) When appointment of candidates is a nullity in law making them disentitled to hold posts, principles of natural justice were not required to be complied with, particularly when same would be noth....
Judicial review generally speaking, is not directed against a decision, bift is directed against the “decision-making process The question of the choice and quantum of punishment is within the jurisd....
Innocent appointees of an erroneous evaluation should not be ousted from service, especially when there is no fraud or misrepresentation on their part.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
