SANDEEP N. BHATT
KHUSHMANBHAI MAGANBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
KUSUMBEN WD/O JERAMBHAI MAGANBHAI PATEL – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP N. BHATT, J.
1. Rule. Learned advocate Mr. Manan Shah waives service of notice of rule for respondents.
2. The present petition is filed with the following prayers:
(b) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of the present petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to stay the implementation, execution and operation of the impugned order below Exh.33, dated 21.11.2022 in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 5 of 2018 Annex. A Colly.
(c) xxxx”
3. The brief facts leading to filing of this petition are as under:
3.2 It is the say of the petitioners that in view of family set
Subraya M.N. vs. Vittala M.N. (2016) 8 SCC 705
State of Maharashtra vs. Digambar
S. Shanmugam Pillai and Others vs. K. Shanmugam Pillai and Others
Thulasidhara and Another vs. Narayanappa and Others
Thamma Venkata Subbamma vs. Thamma Rattamma
Veetrag Holding Co. Ltd. vs. Gujarat State Textile Corporation Ltd. 1996 (3) GLR 536
Yellapu Uma Maheswari and Another vs. Buddha Jagadheeswara Rao and Others
Celina Coelho Pereira and Others vs. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and Others
Dalpat Kumar and Another vs. Prahlad Singh and Others
Dev Prakash and Another vs. Indra and Others
Estralla Rubber vs. Dass Estate (P) Ltd. (2001) 8 SCC 97
Garment Craft vs. Prakash Chand Goel
Kale vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.