SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 1285

R. M. CHHAYA, MAUNA M. BHATT
Amjiba Wd/o. Narendrasinh Alias Kalusinh Champaksinh Dabhi – Appellant
Versus
Lilaram Johrilal Yadav – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kaash K. Thakkar.
For the Defendant : Mr. Tanmay B. Karia.

JUDGMENT :

R.M. Chhaya, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dis-satisfied by the judgement and award dated 7.2.2018 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Palanpur in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.90 of 2017, the appellants-original claimants have preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”)

2. Heard Mr. Kaash Thakkar, learned advocate appearing for the appellants and Mr. Tanmay Karia, learned advocate appearing for respondent No.3 – IFFCO Tokyo General Insurance Co. Ltd. As the liability is not denied, presence of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 is not essential for deciding the present appeal and with the consent of learned advocates appearing for the parties, the appeal is taken up for final disposal forthwith.

3. Draft amendment submitted by the appellants to enhance the appeal stands allowed. The same may be carried out forthwith.

4. Following facts emerge from the record of the appeal.

4.1. According to the appellants-claimants, deceased Narendrasinh @ Kalusinh Champaksinh Dabhi was proceeding towards village Aatrol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top