Back
A. S. SUPEHIA, M. R. MENGDEY
Kanjibhai Karsanbhai Karpatiya (Patel) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Railway, (Government of India) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. Supehia, J.
1. The present applications have been filed for the following reliefs :
B. Be pleased to direct the respondents authorities to recompute and pass fresh award at the present market value and to make payment of compensation immediately without further delay and to place the compliance report before this Hon’ble High Court
AND/OR
Respondent authorities be directed to pay compiund interest at the rate of 10% per annum on delayed payment i.e. from the date of award to actual payment.”
2. The prayer clauses suggests that the applicants are seeking directions against the respondent No.4 for willfully non-complying with the directions issued by this Court and also in prayer clause at Paragraph No.10-B, the directions are sought that the respondents may re-compute and pass a fresh award at the present market value and to make payment of compensation immediately without furth
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limitation on the appealability of a contempt Judge's order under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act and Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules....
Point of Law : Contempt Case - wilful disobedience - Applicant is aggrieved by the compensation so awarded by the State authorities, he may approach the forum available under the law challenging the ....
The court ruled that failure to sign a Memorandum of Understanding precludes claimants from benefits, and contempt proceedings cannot challenge prior judgments.
The appellant committed contempt by willfully disobeying a court order directing the deposit of compensation, emphasizing the imperative for compliance with judicial directives.
The court's jurisdiction in contempt proceedings is limited to ensuring compliance with the writ court order and does not extend to adjudicating the quantum of compensation.
Availing legal remedies does not amount to obstruction in the course of justice, and filing a contempt petition on false and flimsy grounds and suppressing material facts is an abuse of process of th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
