ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Ramanbhai Gokaldas Patel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
It is submitted by Mr. N.K.Majmudar, learned advocate for the petitioners, that the petitioner Nos.1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 25, 73, 104 and 117 were also party in another writ petitions preferred through the Association and that they have already been granted benefit of one increment post retirement. In view thereof, he does not press the present Special Civil Application qua the said petitioners. Accordingly, this Special Civil Application stands dismissed as not pressed qua the aforesaid petitioner Nos.1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 25, 73, 104 and 117.
2. The present Special Civil Application is filed praying for the following reliefs:-
B. Your Lordship may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction and quash and set aside the action of the respondent authorities of not releasing the periodical/yearly increment preceding for discharge of duties by the petitioners for a period preceding the one year preceding the 1st week of July of respective calendar in which the petitioners attended the age of superannuation and therefore the said action of the respondent authorities for not releasing the last yearly/periodical increm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.