Back
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Khemchandbhai Govindbhai Parmar – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present Special Civil Application is filed praying for the following reliefs:-
B. YOUR LORDSHIP may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction and quash and set aside the action of the respondent authorities of not releasing the periodical/ yearly increment preceding for discharge of duties by the petitioners for a period preceding the one year preceding the 1st week of July of respective calendar year in which the petitioners attended the age of superannuation and therefore the said action of the respondent authorities for not releasing the last yearly/periodical increment to the petitioners though the petitioners have attended the age of superannuation on 30th June of the respective calendar year and became eligible and entitle to get yearly increment. the aforesaid action for not releasing the yearly increment is arbitrary and illegal;
C. Be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to pass appropriate order for making payment/for releasing the periodical yearly increment/increments which has become due and payable to the petitioners as the basis of discharge of duties from the 1st week July of
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to receive increment crystallizes when the government servant completes requisite length of service with good conduct and beco....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that government servants are entitled to annual increment after retirement, as the increment becomes payable on the succeeding day and denying it w....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that government servants are entitled to annual increment becoming payable on the succeeding day, even after retirement, and denying this entitleme....
The entitlement to receive increment crystallizes when the government servant completes requisite length of service with good conduct and becomes payable on the succeeding day, and denying a governme....
Government servants are entitled to annual increments after retirement for the services rendered over a year with good behavior and efficiency, as interpreted by the Division Bench of the Court and t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of a government servant to annual increment after retirement, emphasizing that denying the benefit earned through good conduct and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to receive increment crystallizes when the government servant completes requisite length of service with good conduct, and any....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of a government servant to receive an increment becoming payable on 1st July even after retirement, as interpreted in various judgm....
Employees entitled to notional increment earned before retirement despite accruing post-retirement, based on satisfactory prior service.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
