A. Y. KOGJE, SAMIR J. DAVE
Parixit Dilipkumar Vyas – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SAMIR J. DAVE, J.
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following reliefs:
(b) That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to allow this present Special Civil application by issuing appropriate writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing and set aside the detention order at pre-execution stage passed by respondent no.2 under the provisions of section 3 of the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980; as same being illegal, invalid, null and void, arbitrary, suffers from non-application of mind, without jurisdiction and competence, suffering from malafides and violative of art 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India;
(c) Pending admission hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to restrain the respondents and or their agent’s, servant’s persons, employee etc. From executing the proposed order of detention upon the petitioner during the pending hearing and final disposal of this petition in the interest of justice;
(d) xxx.. xxx… x
Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab
Sayed Taher Bawamiya v. Joint Secretary to the Government of India
Shaikh Haneef v. State of W.B.
State of Bihar v. Rambalak, Singh
Vijaysinh @ Gatti Pruthvisinh Rathod Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors.
A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
Deepak Bajaj Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Francis Coralic Mullin v. The Administrator
Ichudevi Choraris v. Union of India
Kamla Khushalani v. State of Maharashtra
Mohammed Alam v. State of W.B.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.